Sufficient Cause to Set Aside Ex parte order Cassation Case No.: 169017

Date: August 6, 2011 (Hamle 30, 2011 E.C.)

Summary of the Case:

The case began in the Bako Tibe District Court of the Oromia National Regional State. An ex-parte judgment was rendered against the Applicant after he failed to file an answer. The Applicant applied to set aside the judgment, providing medical evidence that he was in a hospital for 43 days (from 17/02/2011 to 30/03/2011 E.C.) caring for his child who was in a car accident. The trial court rejected this, stating the accident occurred before the suit was filed and that the Applicant knew the appointment date. This was affirmed by the Zonal High Court and the Regional Supreme Court.

Legal Interpretation:

Articles 72 and 78(1)(2) of the Civil Procedure Code aim to protect a defendant’s right to be heard. If an ex-parte order or judgment is issued, it should be set aside if the defendant demonstrates a “sufficient cause” for their absence. Furthermore, as established in Cassation File No. 15835, there is no procedural mechanism that entirely excludes a defendant from a case simply because they failed to appear on the date for filing an answer.

Reasoning:

 The medical evidence confirmed that the 43-day hospitalization overlapped with the period for filing the statement of defense.

 While the accident happened before the suit, the ongoing medical treatment during the litigation period constitutes “sufficient cause.”

 Denying the Applicant the opportunity to present evidence and deciding the case solely on the Respondent’s evidence violates the Applicant’s fundamental right to be heard.

Ruling:

1. The decisions of the Bako Tibe District Court, the West Shoa Zone High Court, and the Oromia Supreme Court are reversed.

2. The case is remanded to the Bako Tibe District Court to allow the Applicant to file a statement of defense and to hear the case anew.

Leave a Reply